If you haven’t heard, President Obama called the owner of the Philadelphia Eagles, Jeffrey Lurie, this week and praised him for giving Michael Vick a “second chance” by signing him after he spent time in jail for running an interstate dog fighting ring.
As an animal lover and advocate, I find myself conflicted with this praise.
On the one hand, I despise what Michael Vick represents on so many levels. Excess. Ego. Celebrity in America. As a Southwest Virginia native, I also had the added annoyance of hearing about Michael Vick constantly while he played for Virginia Tech (ugh!), so I am somewhat predisposed to dislike him anyways.
And as if I didn’t dislike him enough, Vick made sure to solidify my distaste for him with his dog fighting operation. Quite clearly I despise Vick's treatment of animals. I believe a human that can be cruel to an animal is likely capable of being just as cruel to another human being. So as a person, I believe Michael Vick is pretty low.
But on the other hand, he did his time and paid for his crime (at least according to the law), and now speaks out against animal cruelty. Part of me just wonders how sincere can he really be in his advocacy. It all seems to me that Vick is just trying to save his reputation and return to his former glory by making nice with animal rights advocates.
As a person who believes in redemption, I am pleased with President Obama’s faith in humanity and the possibility of redemption after such a fall. Also, having grown up with a father working in the judicial system and now a husband who works in corrections, I would like to believe that there can be rehabilitation for offenders, that they can truly have a second chance at life and become positive, contributing members of society. I find blogger Anne Althouse’s thoughts and perspective interesting:
“How inspiring is the return of Michael Vick? Will it hearten those who are attempting to return to society after serving time and make the rest of us more likely to welcome them back? Or will it make us more likely to think cynically that the rich and famous get special exceptions from the rules? Does Vick make the field look more level or less level?"
PETA President Ingrid Newkirk has deemed President Obama’s praise for vick as “appropriate,” stating that “We all want a president who can lift us up and move us forward when ugly things happen, but that cannot let us forget and remain watchful to avoid future abuses.”
I’d like to know, what do you think about Obama’s praise of Michael Vick?